Scientists who perform life-threatening experiments on any particular animal species should not have permission to do so, because all animals deserve rights, and should be treated equally. Animals have every right to live and be free. They should not be locked up in cages and used for experiments. An example would be lab rats, which are small, furry, creatures that are experimented on horrifically in scientific labs. All species should be treated equally; no matter what shape, size, color or behavior they may dictate.
Animals are not able to speak up as humans do; if they could it is imaginable and almost guaranteed that scientists would not dare touch another animal. This is a horrendous act of unfair cruelty towards millions of innocent animals. “Meanwhile, scientists routinely perform experiments on fruit flies, frogs, pigs, fish, rabbits, dogs and cats. But the most common subjects are rats, mice and birds, which make up about 95 percent of all lab animals” (Fehr-Snyder and Hart). The fact these animals are small in size, and produce babies by the hundreds does not give any one the right to kill and torture animals of any species.
The scientists who are performing these experiments are actually causing unnecessary torture to animals. “Isn't it immoral to breed creatures for the sole purpose of killing them, to raise them so they can be sliced, diced and studied?” (Fehr-Snyder and Hart). It is wrong, and noticed the animals experimented on are of only certain species. Don’t lab rats and birds deserve rights as any other species? Why not perform such experiments on horses, dolphins, giraffes, and lions or any animal of that sort? Are they not suggestible creatures to use for the daily research in labs? Isn’t this an unfair decision towards certain species? These creatures have emotional, physical, and sensory feelings, which is what the human being feels as well. Yet, why do we neglect those points?
There are so many people fighting for animal rights. Only time can tell when their voices will be heard. The sad part is that animal cruelty can be ended right now; yet no one takes a stand. “It still surprises many people to learn that non-animal testing methods are not only more ethical, they are also more applicable to human health. The differences in biology, chemistry and physiology mean that research conducted on animals doesn't always translate effectively to humans” (Barnard). This statement demonstrates two points; the first point is that there are more efficient ways of doing experiments rather than causing the deaths of innocent bystanders. Secondly, the research done on animals don’t relate to humans in certain aspects, such as biologically, physiologically, and through chemistry. This makes the experiments performed on animals unnecessary and cruel.
In conclusion, animals deserve special rights that should be directly announced to scientists and action should take place. Those who are creating cruel experiments towards animals of any species and cause unnecessary deaths should be stopped. Such people should understand that animals have emotions, and feelings just as humans do. We must take this into consideration for the well being of the animal kingdom and each individual species as a whole. Whether it’s a goat, monkey, dog, tiger, zebra, bear or any creature in the world, they should all be treated fairly, equally and with respect. “ It's been called our next big moral challenge. Over the next century, activists say, we will come to see animals in a different way and recognize that we can no longer use them for our own ends” (Fehr-Snyder and Hart). One day we will see animals differently, and develop and understanding that animals can no longer be tortured or harmed, but loved; no species will be left behind.
Works Cited
Barnard, Neal. "Ask the Doc: What Are Alternatives to Animal Testing?." Vegetarian Times.
March 2007: 19-21. SIRS Researcher. Web. 20 Oct 2010.
Fehr-Snyder, Kerry, and others. "Almost Human." Arizona Republic (Phoenix, AZ). Dec. 10
2000: J1-J2. SIRS Researcher. Web. 20 Oct 2010.